Lessons from Radiation in Hiroshima and Goiânia: Risks and Reconstruction

Discover how the radiological events in Hiroshima and Goiânia highlight the vital role of engineering, science, and information in risk control and urban reconstruction.

March 20, 20264 min read
Editorial cover for: Lessons from Radiation in Hiroshima and Goiânia: Risks and Reconstruction

Almost 40 years earlier, on the other side of the world, in 1945, Hiroshima had been destroyed in seconds by a nuclear bomb.

Two different events.

But with something in common:

👉 radiation out of control

And, after the chaos, an inevitable question:

👉 how to rebuild after the invisible?


🇧🇷 Goiânia, 1987: the accident no one saw coming

https://files.cercomp.ufg.br/weby/up/243/o/naom_59b94891da848.jpg
https://files.cercomp.ufg.br/weby/up/243/o/naom_59b94891da848.jpg
https://c.files.bbci.co.uk/A885/production/_103714134_5-1.jpg
https://c.files.bbci.co.uk/A885/production/_103714134_5-1.jpg
https://sites.unicentro.br/wp/petfisica/files/2015/10/Imagem-I.jpg
https://sites.unicentro.br/wp/petfisica/files/2015/10/Imagem-I.jpg

4

It all started with an abandoned device.

A radiotherapy machine, left behind in a closed clinic.

No protection.
No control.
No information.

Two men found the device and took it to a scrapyard.

Inside it, there was a bright blue powder.

Beautiful.
Curious.
Deadly.

Unknowingly, people started touching, carrying, and even sharing that material.

Within days:

  • dozens of contaminated people

  • entire neighborhoods isolated

  • houses demolished

  • lives changed forever


⚠️ The biggest mistake was not technical

It was informational.

No one knew what was happening.

👉 Radiation has no smell
👉 No color (despite the glow in the case of Cesium)
👉 It does not warn

The Goiânia tragedy exposed a harsh truth:

👉 lack of information can be as dangerous as the risk itself


🇯🇵 Hiroshima, 1945: when the world saw total destruction

https://static.nationalgeographicbrasil.com/files/styles/image_3200/public/nationalgeographic_611592_0.webp?h=900&w=1600
https://static.nationalgeographicbrasil.com/files/styles/image_3200/public/nationalgeographic_611592_0.webp?h=900&w=1600
https://brasil.un.org/sites/default/files/styles/featured_image/public/2020-08/hiroshima.jpg?itok=Sh0JS1P-
https://brasil.un.org/sites/default/files/styles/featured_image/public/2020-08/hiroshima.jpg?itok=Sh0JS1P-
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/8/8f/A-bomb_dome.jpg
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/8/8f/A-bomb_dome.jpg

4

On August 6, 1945, a nuclear bomb exploded over Hiroshima.

In seconds:

  • more than 70 thousand people died

  • the city was practically wiped out

  • structures disappeared

  • the soil was contaminated

Unlike Goiânia, here the impact was immediate.

But the invisible enemy remained:

👉 radiation


🧠 And then came the impossible question

How to rebuild a place where:

  • the soil was contaminated?

  • the infrastructure vanished?

  • the risk still existed?

The answer came with something that goes far beyond construction:

👉 engineering + science + planning + resilience


🏗️ The role of engineering in Hiroshima's reconstruction

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/d/d2/Skyline_of_Hiroshima_from_Mount_Kogane2020.jpg
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/d/d2/Skyline_of_Hiroshima_from_Mount_Kogane2020.jpg
https://cdn.pragmatika.media/2022/05/%D1%85%D1%96%D1%80%D0%BE%D1%81%D1%96%D0%BC%D0%B0-%D1%82%D1%80%D0%B0-22-7.jpg
https://cdn.pragmatika.media/2022/05/%D1%85%D1%96%D1%80%D0%BE%D1%81%D1%96%D0%BC%D0%B0-%D1%82%D1%80%D0%B0-22-7.jpg
https://www.globaltimes.cn/Portals/0/attachment/2015/2015-08-06/bdddc85e-dc7d-45e4-9964-f84d56ca14ba.jpg
https://www.globaltimes.cn/Portals/0/attachment/2015/2015-08-06/bdddc85e-dc7d-45e4-9964-f84d56ca14ba.jpg

4

Hiroshima's reconstruction was not just physical.

It was strategic.


1. 🧪 Radiation control and study

Before building, it was necessary to understand:

  • contamination levels

  • safe areas

  • soil impact

👉 science directly applied to engineering


2. 🏙️ Comprehensive urban planning

The city was redesigned:

  • new roads

  • open areas

  • safety zones

  • modern infrastructure

👉 it was not just rebuilding — it was reimagining


3. 🏗️ New construction standards

The reconstruction brought:

  • more resistant structures

  • improvements in urban organization

  • integration between public space and safety


4. 🌿 Symbolic transformation

Hiroshima became:

👉 a symbol of peace
👉 an example of resilience
👉 a proof of what engineering can achieve


## ⚖️ Brazil vs Japan: two tragedies, two lessons

| Aspect | Goiânia (1987) | Hiroshima (1945) |

|--------|----------------|------------------|

| Event type | Radiological accident | Nuclear bomb |

| Scale | Local | Massive |

| Main cause | Control and information failure | War |

| Biggest problem | Lack of knowledge | Total destruction |

| Response | Emergency containment | Planned reconstruction |


🔥 The common point no one notices

In both cases:

👉 the danger was invisible
👉 information arrived late
👉 the impact was devastating

But there is a crucial difference:

👉 what was done afterward


🚀 What this teaches engineering today

These events show that engineering is not just building.

It is:

  • anticipating risks

  • controlling information

  • protecting lives

  • rebuilding intelligently


🧠 Modern engineering has learned (or should have learned)

Today we have:

  • real-time monitoring

  • sensors (IoT)

  • digital modeling (BIM)

  • risk control

But all depends on one factor:

👉 correct use of information


⚠️ The greatest risk remains invisible

It is not radiation.

It is not concrete.

It is not steel.

👉 It is lack of control
👉 It is management failure
👉 It is absence of information


🌍 Conclusion: when everything ends, engineering begins

Goiânia showed what happens when we fail.

Hiroshima showed what is possible when we rebuild.

Between error and reconstruction there is a path:

👉 knowledge
👉 responsibility
👉 engineering


🔎 Final reflection

If an invisible error happened today…

👉 would your project, your company, or your city be prepared?


📚 Sources and references

  • Goiânia radiological accident

  • Hiroshima atomic bombing

  • Radioactive Emergency

  • Historical reports, urban reconstruction studies, and radiation impacts

  • Build Brazil Guide (engineering context, management, and technological evolution)

RR

Autoria

Redação Redax

Equipe editorial

A Redação Redax é a equipe editorial da Redax Engenharia, composta por engenheiros, especialistas em ESG e comunicadores especializados em construção civil, segurança do trabalho e infraestrutura, com base em Osasco (SP).

Artigo anterior

Ambiental

Como evitar desperdício de água na construção civil

Nenhum artigo seguinte disponivel nesta sequencia editorial.

Related reading

More from this locale